News Review: Virginia Gun Laws


The push for infringement on the right to bear arms is coming to a head in the state of Virginia.  The state legislature is now primarily composed of democrats.  If you look at what the democratic party promotes, it is falsely well intentioned policies that lead to modern day serfdom – in other words, powerless individuals that are reliant on government.  So, it is no surprise that democrats seek to make serfs by taking away the individuals right to bear arms under the premise of preventing crime.

Of the bills that passed, CBS presents a synopsis as follows.
...[the] bills tackle everything from universal background checks (S. B. 70- Background Checks), [a] one gun a month limit, (S.B. 69- One-Gun-a-Month Limit), red flag laws, firearms and ammunition to be controlled by localities (S.B. 35- Local Authority), as well as firearms being restricted at public events.

All of these bills are in violation to the Bill of Rights.  The 2nd amendment requires states to abide by people's unconditional right to bear arms.  You can learn about the 2nd amendment and legitimate restrictions to it from the videos in the playlist in the video description.

If globalists, the one's behind these gun restrictions, cared about the law, they would change the constitution.  But, globalists don't care about the law or the legitimacy of rule, they only care about the power to rule.  And, the power to rule lies in the threat of force.  If you can get police to enforce a law, it doesn't matter whether that law is invalidated by a superior law.  In this case, if you can get police to enforce laws that infringe upon the right to bear arms, it doesn't matter that the right to bear arms is the supreme law of the land.  If you watch my previous video about how police aren't honorable, it is clear enough that you can get police to act as thugs for globalists.

With the legitimate restrictions of the right to bear arms in mind, let's take a look at what Governor  Northan says:

He says, “I’m a supporter of the Second Amendment,” adding, “I hear people out there saying that they don’t want law enforcement to enforce unconstitutional laws. Well we’re not going to propose or pass any unconstitutional laws.”

And yet, he’s done both.  As such, he is expecting people to accept this bold faced lie.   He gets away with this for a few reasons.  The first is, globalist puppets don’t care about or understand the constitution.  They will assert their right of free speech to protect their degeneracy while calling speech they don’t like hate speech.
Second, those who do understand the 2nd amendment are ineffective and conserving it.
Third, even people who aren’t globalists puppets don't understand the 2nd amendment.  They think it is for personal self protection and hunting.  Which leads to the next observation about this situation.

From the NRA spokeswoman, Catherine Mortensen, she says:

“Regrettably, Virginia lawmakers approved a series of measures today that will make it harder for law-abiding Virginians to protect themselves, while doing nothing to stop criminals,” 

Here, instead of delineating the foundational understanding of the 2nd amendment, that it is presenting a natural right primarily in the effort to prevent tyranny, the NRA spokeswoman focuses on the side issue of how guns affect crime.  The 2nd amendment doesn’t state, "in order to prevent crime, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".  How the right to bear arms affects crime has no bearing on the right.  

The foundational understanding of the 2nd amendment is apparent in history.  The discussion about it in its formation is in the public record.  There is no technical reason why the NRA could be so inept at making the public understand the 2nd amendment.  Instead, the NRA allows the conversation to be about hunting and crime.  For this reason, I conclude, if the NRA is not controlled opposition, it might as well be.

To top it off, the NRA spokeswoman continues stating:

“We are pleased one of the most egregious gun confiscation bills was pulled from consideration. The NRA will continue our work with lawmakers to find solutions that address the root cause of violent crime, rather than punishing honest, hardworking Virginians.”

Instead of presenting the fact that the Virginian government has voided their right to rule by willfully breaching the social contract, the NRA spokeswoman essentially says, “it could be worse but keep giving us your money”.

The legitimacy of government lies in the social contract.   In the US, this social contract is present in the form of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the various state government constitutions.  This is why all government employees give an oath of office which requires they swear to uphold the constitution.  When government willfully breaches this contract, it voids its right to rule and it has no more legitimacy than a thug with a gun.

A final thing to consider about this situation is that it may be used to further emotionally drive people against gun ownership.  Globalists can’t have sheriffs fighting against infringement of the right to bear arms.  Consequently, globalists will seek to undermine the sheriffs individually or they will stage an event which pits public opinion against them.  And, there is a gun rally coming up in Virginia which may be used for some fabricated gun violence to turn the public against gun ownership.  So, watch out for it and if you are going to this gun rally, make sure you record everything.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *